Retraction Record

Behavioural economics

Dan Ariely: Insurance field experiment data, 2021, and 2026 procrastination study allegations

Duke University, Fuqua School of Business

Under investigation Duke's investigation of the 2012 paper ended in 2024, and a retraction request by his co-author on a 2002 Psychological Science paper was under journal review as of September 2026. No new Duke investigation had been announced.2,4

Papers

PaperActionDateReason stated
Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end (Shu, Mazar, Gino, Ariely and Bazerman)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.12097461091,3,5
Retracted13 September 2021Data Colada reported that the mileage data in Study 3, a field experiment with an auto insurer, underwent at least two forms of fabrication. NPR reported the authors retracted the paper.
Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment (Ariely and Wertenbroch)
Psychological Science, 20024
Retraction requestedSeptember 2026Data Colada concluded the data were severely tampered with or fabricated to produce the desired results, mainly in Study 2. Co-author Klaus Wertenbroch asked the journal to retract. The journal review was ongoing, per Poets and Quants.

Investigations

Response

Ariely said in 2023 that getting the data file was the extent of my involvement with the data (NPR), and in 2026 said he was cooperating with the journal review of the 2002 paper (Poetsandquants).3,4

Sources

  1. Data Colada, [98] Evidence of Fraud in an Influential Field Experiment About Dishonesty (17 August 2021)
  2. Dan Ariely (approved for posting by Duke University), Statement on conclusion of Duke investigation (2 April 2024)
  3. NPR (Planet Money), Did an honesty researcher fabricate data? (2023)
  4. Poets and Quants, Data Colada accuses Duke's Dan Ariely of tampering with data in a second influential study (2 September 2026)
  5. PNAS, via Crossref, Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports, Crossref metadata (retraction notice 10.1073/pnas.2115397118) (13 September 2021)